Let's get the moping out of the way right now. Sunday was Valentine's Day. I decided to spend this post-three day hiatus entry talking about the aptly named Singles Awareness Day.
Apart from spending it working for five hours, I also spent Valentines alone. For the 18th straight year. It got me thinking when, and certainly if, I'll ever have someone to give chocolates, flowers, and stuffed animals to somewhere down the line when the calendar dictates I do so.
Then I got into thinking who she'd be, what she'd be like, where she'd come from, etc. In between sticking my hands in three or four different kinds of meat, I started to carve out what my perfect girl would be like.
Now, ask any guy to describe the perfect girl and they'll tell you one of three things.
The first thing would be a slew of romance novel adjectives. The guy will list off all of the things you'd expect them too: she's smart, funny, and fun to be around. They might throw in "beautiful" or some form of "fantastic", and all of this may well be true, but it seems to me that people that only list these things off in their descriptions are really just sugarcoating what they truly mean.
"I don't really find her that interesting, but oh my god she's got big boobs."
Crude, I know, but we're talking about guys here. Though some pompous pricks will say that this is just some beaten-to-death cliche girls chatter on about when they hand around in groups of three or more, the male is just not a very complex being. It is true that we think with two completely seperate parts of our bodies, moreso in the area that doesn't actually have any cognitive ability. That much I admit. I can't exactly apologize for it though. It's just kind of how we are. The differentiation lies in how open we are about it.
The second thing is a less veiled form of the "baby got back and front" description. This is the misogenistic douchebag who says that a woman's place is in the kitchen, not speaking unless spoken to, and being generally submissive. There's nothing interesting in that. There's just no personality in submission. Saying that all you want out of a woman is sandwiches and quiet approval is like wearing a giant sign around your neck (or wearing a novelty t-shirt) that says "I fuck on the first date" written across it. For one, it doubles as a crown labeled "The Douchebag", italics and all. For another, the kind of girls you attract with such statements tend to be terrified of being anything more than one-dimensional.
The third thing is flat out admitting that physical features are the most and least, and by extension only, positive things about her. I mean, technically that's what nature diversified them for. Sort of like the petals on flowers, the size of certain physical features act like one of those mosquito lamps that put the annoying little bastards in a trance before zapping the horny out of them. If you can tell me any other advantage to having such natural endowments, other than "instant seat cushions" or "instant back problems" (if you're into constant, unrelenting pain), then you'd probably be the first.
Regardless, they're not exactly a platform for perfection.
I've heard a few other definitions of a perfect girl from several people, a few alcoholics telling me that they're the ones that you can just have a beer with like they were just another one of the guys and one less-than-mature fellow telling me they're the ones that "you know are going to put out on Prom night".
I have a lot of time to think in silence in my job, or at least I do now that I've learned to drown out the same fucking 80s and 90s pop music playlist that plays every single day without fail. I also have quite the imagination, as I'm sure a few of you have discovered. It took me a little bit, but I think I pinned down the truth about the perfect girl.
They just don't exist.
Of course, the same goes for the perfect guy. I mean, there are more than a few guys that I've seen that are smart, witty, and have the bodies of Olympians; Girls drool over them, and then find out that he plays a game called "Fudge Popsicles" with his gardener Esteban on the weekends.
There's something wrong with everyone in the world and it's in how we learn to overcome those imperfections that we learn to love them.
It's bursting out laughing when they start talking with a weird accent or impediment, and having them look straight back at you and laugh just as hard.
It's saying something completely, mind-bogglingly random or downright stupid, quieting the room in the process, and seeing them try to contain laughter as everyone stares.
It's being able tell them anything and everything, and remain in good spirits when they start making fun of you for it.
It's coming home after a frustrating day and lighting up as soon as you see they texted you.
It's the intangibles. You can't define it at all, but there is some element of perfection to be had in everyone.
I've often said that my desire for a girl that is as smart if not smarter than me is going to be the death of me, but I'm positive that in the end it'll all be worth it because at the end of the day I'll still love her for it.
Listen. There's always someone out there. I know it sounds cliche, but hear me out for a second. You may go through the rest of your life wandering in solitude amidst these dark predicaments, but more often than not the one you will end up with will begin as a haphazard, seemingly isolated encounter. Whoever it may be may have never seen you online or chatted in a cafe or visited your place of work or residence before. These relationships will always begin with absolutely nothing, followed by what may or may not be a short period of bickering and disagreement and will generally either branch into an end to a relationship or a renewed strength in one.
ReplyDeleteSecondly, I'd like to point out that Valentine's Day (if it ever meant anything more than the following) is a self-righteous materialistic delusion of grandeur and almost feral adhesion to a mass consumer culture. Generally speaking, it is nothing more than a demonstration of a clear facade in a relationship.
Even on a broader scale...I believe that this generation has become entirely engrossed with a hugely exaggerated paradigm on which to base their perception of life itself. In essence, it comes down to who or what is our apotheosis? Who ultimately pays the price for modern society's trends? Does our disillusionment of our lives only further the superficiality of our civilization as we know it, or are we empowered and motivated by nonexistence, desolation, and nothingness as opposed to aggressive congregationalism?